Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499674›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2024

Technologies for Targeted RNA Degradation and Induced RNA Decay.

Sigitas Mikutis, Gonçalo J L Bernardes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Biologics for cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeted RNA Degradation as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. PEI-FeBiosensors · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sigitas MikutisYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.
Gonçalo J L BernardesYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6594-8917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of the human genome codes for RNA, but RNA-targeting therapeutics account for a small fraction of approved drugs. As such, there is great incentive to improve old and develop new approaches to RNA targeting. For many RNA targeting modalities, just binding is not sufficient to exert a therapeutic effect; thus, targeted RNA degradation and induced decay emerged as powerful approaches with a pronounced biological effect. This review covers the origins and advanced use cases of targeted RNA degrader technologies grouped by the nature of the targeting modality as well as by the mode of degradation. It covers both well-established methods and clinically successful platforms such as RNA interference, as well as emerging approaches such as recruitment of RNA quality control machinery, CRISPR, and direct targeted RNA degradation. We also share our thoughts on the biggest hurdles in this field, as well as possible ways to overcome them.

Indexed as

RNARNA StabilityCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansRNA InterferenceRNA

Identifiers

PMID39499674
PMCPMC11638902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.