Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499701›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Genome-Wide, Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for rare chromosomal abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Marton Konya, Agnes Czimbalmos, Lotti Loczi, Tamas Koi, Caner Turan, Rita Nagy, Nandor Acs, Peter Hegyi, Szabolcs Varbiro, Aniko Gal

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marton KonyaCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Agnes CzimbalmosCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0001-2278-5625
Lotti LocziCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3077-7796
Tamas KoiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0775-1088
Caner TuranCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-7569
Rita NagyCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Nandor AcsCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Szabolcs VarbiroCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Aniko GalCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2059-5748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-Wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (GW-NIPT) can provide positive results not only for common autosomal aneuploidies but also for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) and structural chromosomal abnormalities (StrCAs). Due to their rarity, there is currently insufficient information on positive predictive value PPV of RAT and StrCA-positive cases in the literature. In this study, the screening accuracy and pregnancy outcomes of cases positive for rare chromosomal abnormalities were examined based on publications in which GW-NIPT testing was performed. True positive cases were determined using two different methodologies. One was a confirmed methodology, where only cases validated by genetic testing were considered true positives with a definite diagnosis, and the other was an extended methodology, where, in addition to cases confirmed by genetic testing, intrauterine fetal death and termination of pregnancy due to an abnormality confirmed by ultrasound examination were also considered true positives, where no diagnosis had been made but the fetus was probably affected. Seventeen studies were analyzed, with a total GW-NIPT population of 740,076. Of these, 1,738 were RAT positive. Using the confirmed method, we found the highest rates of true positives in T16, followed by T22, and T2, using the extended method, the highest rate of true positives in T15, T16 and T22. This is the first meta-analysis to determine the frequency of rare chromosomal abnormalities, test-positive rates, and the PPV of each chromosomal abnormality with high precision. Our results could aid pre- and post-test genetic counselling and help patients and clinicians in their decision-making.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansNoninvasive Prenatal TestingPregnancyPrenatal Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39499701
PMCPMC11537411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.