ArticleCureus2024
Assessing Patient Understanding and Satisfaction in Orthopedic Trauma and Elective Surgery Admissions.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Adaptation and Validation of the Polish Version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Satisfaction Among Women After Gynecological Surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background When seeking healthcare, patients often struggle to understand the information provided by healthcare professionals regarding their condition and treatment plan. Additionally, patient satisfaction with their experience can vary widely. Improved patient understanding and satisfaction are linked to better outcomes. This study aims to explore the factors influencing patient understanding to help healthcare professionals enhance these aspects. Objective This study evaluated the level of understanding and satisfaction among patients attending outpatient appointments. It also investigated factors influencing understanding by examining differences in results across various patient groups and analyzing these variations. Methods This study was conducted at Queens' Hospital Burton, a level III trauma unit, over a three-week period in September 2023. Patients attending their orthopedic outpatient appointments were given a questionnaire, which included both bipolar 1-5 scale questions and open-ended text response questions. Results Patients generally reported high levels of understanding and satisfaction, averaging 90.34% and 96.20%, respectively. Those seen in a nurse-led clinic demonstrated significantly greater understanding of their condition compared to those seen by a physician (p = 0.0377). Additionally, trauma patients had a significantly higher level of understanding (p = 0.0167) and satisfaction (p = 0.0115). Conclusions To achieve better patient outcomes, it is crucial to optimize both patient understanding and satisfaction. Nurse-led clinics demonstrate higher levels of understanding, so identifying and incorporating the factors that contribute to this success into physician-led clinics is essential. These factors may include differences in communication methods, the resources provided, or the consultation setting. Additionally, the educational methods used with trauma patients appear more effective than those used for elective cases and should be evaluated to determine if they can enhance understanding and outcomes in other settings. Implementing evidence-based strategies for effective patient communication, such as maintaining good eye contact, avoiding medical jargon, and establishing rapport, could improve understanding and satisfaction and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.