ReviewHeliyon2024
The implications of oncolytic viruses targeting fibroblasts in enhancing the antitumoural immune response.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cracking the shield: oncolytic viruses versus the tumor-immune fortress.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Resistance to oncolytic virotherapy: Multidimensional mechanisms and therapeutic breakthroughs (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Oncolytic herpes simplex virus reprograms cancer-associated fibroblasts to enhance antitumor immunity in pancreatic cancer.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Article
- Multidimensional transcriptomics based to illuminate the mechanisms of taurine metabolism in immune resistance of pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are an emerging immunotherapy platform that selectively target tumour cells, inducing immunogenic cell death. This reverses the 'immune-desert' phenotype of tumours, enhancing antitumour immunity. However, oncolytic virotherapy has shown limited efficacy in solid tumours due to the presence of protumoural, immunosuppressive cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Recent studies have explored OVs that specifically target CAFs to enhance antitumoural immune responses, with promising results. Nevertheless, detailed interrogation of the experimental design of these studies casts doubt on their potential for successful clinical translation. Most studies targeted CAFs non-specifically, failing to acknowledge CAF heterogeneity, with antitumoural CAFs also present. Thus, use of transcriptomics is advisable to provide more focused targeting, limiting potential off-target toxicity. Furthermore, experiments to date have largely been conducted in murine models that do not faithfully recapitulate tumour microenvironments, potentially biasing the efficacy observed. Future work should make use of humanised patient-derived xenograft murine models for animal studies, after which primary human tumour biopsies should be utilised to more closely represent the patient population for maximal translation relevance. Additionally, approaches to enhance the antitumoural immune responses of this therapy should be prioritised, with the ultimate aim of achieving complete remission, which has not yet been observed pre-clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.