ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Identification of osteoporosis genes using family studies.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a nomogram for the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Molecular medicine reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a multifactorial bone disease characterised by reduced bone mass and increased fracture risk. Family studies have made significant contribution in unravelling the genetics of osteoporosis. Yet, most of the underlying molecular and biological mechanisms remain unknown prompting the need for further studies. This review outlines the proper phenotyping and advanced genetic techniques in the form of high-throughput DNA sequencing used to identify genetic factors underlying monogenic osteoporosis in a family-based setting. The steps related to variant filtering prioritisation and curation are also described. From an evolutionary perspective, deleterious risk variants with higher penetrance tend to be rare as a result of negative selection. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) can identify rare variants with large effect sizes which are likely to be missed by candidate gene analysis or genome-wide association studies (GWAS) wherein common variants with small to moderate effect sizes are identified. We also describe the importance of replicating implicated genes, and possibly variants, identified following HTS to confirm their causality. Replication of the gene in other families, singletons or independent cohorts confirms that the shortlisted genes and/or variants are indeed causal. Furthermore, novel genes and/or variants implicated in monogenic osteoporosis require a thorough validation by means of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.