ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Thrombocytopenia With High C-reactive Protein in Myeloma Patients Treated With Proteasome Inhibitor and/or Immunomodulatory Drugs.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with t (4;14)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Background/Aim: Thrombocytopenia is a poor prognostic factor in patients with myeloma; however, the factors associated with thrombocytopenia have not been extensively discussed. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of thrombocytopenia, defined as 130×10 Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective review of medical records of myeloma patients treated between 2000 and 2021. A total of 241 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 72 years. Overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The incidence of thrombocytopenia was 17.8%. In the median follow-up period of 46.6 months, OS and TTNT in the thrombocytopenia group were significantly shorter than those in the non-thrombocytopenia group using multivariate analysis (p<0.001 and p<0.001). C-reactive protein (CRP) level was not associated with thrombocytopenia, and high CRP predicted short OS and TTNT independently from thrombocytopenia. When the low (neither thrombocytopenia nor high CRP), intermediate (either thrombocytopenia or high CRP), and high (thrombocytopenia and high CRP) risk groups were defined, the OS and TTNT among these groups showed significant differences; the hazard ratios for survival in the high and intermediate risk groups were 7.022 and 2.598, and for TTNT, they were 4.216 and 1.887, respectively, compared to the low-risk group. Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia was associated with the activity of NDMM and predicted prognosis in NDMM. When combined with high CRP levels, thrombocytopenia serves as a new indicator of poor prognosis in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.