ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Intradialytic cardiovascular injury is lowest in high-volume haemodiafiltration: a randomized cross-over trial in four intermittent dialysis strategies.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Kidney-heart crosstalk: the extracellular vesicles connection.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026Review
- Circulating Extracellular Vesicles as Putative Mediators of Cardiovascular Disease in Paediatric Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and subsequent tissue damage may contribute to the poor outcome of chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. While the IDH-incidence is lower in high-volume haemodiafiltration (HV-HDF) than in standard HD (S-HD), survival is better in HV-HDF. Tissue injury, as measured by extracellular vesicle (EV)-release, was compared between four modalities. Methods: Forty chronic patients were cross-over randomized to S-HD, cool-HD (C-HD), low-volume HDF (LV-HDF), and HV-HDF. Blood pressure was recorded every 15 minutes. EVs from circulating blood-cell-elements (bio-incompatibility-related) and cardiovascular (CV) tissues (CV-related), were measured before and after dialysis. The influence of modalities and IDH on the rate of change of EVs was assessed. Both crude and haemoconcentration-adjusted analyses were performed. Results: Leukocyte and erythrocyte-derived EVs increased in all modalities. Platelet-derived EVs increased more in LV-HDF and HV-HDF (68.4 respectively 56.1 × 10 Conclusions: Most EVs increase during HD and HDF. Regarding platelet-derived EVs, HDF appears less biocompatible than HD. Considering CV-related EVs, tissue injury seems less pronounced in HV-HDF. The finding that EV release is IDH-independent needs confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.