ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Biological effects in normal human fibroblasts following chronic and acute irradiation with both low- and high-LET radiation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radiobiological studies at low dose rates allow us to improve our knowledge of the mechanisms by which radiation exerts its effects on biological systems following chronic exposures. Moreover, these studies can complement available epidemiological data on the biological effects of low doses and dose rates of ionizing radiation. Very few studies have simultaneously compared the biological effects of low- and high-LET radiations at the same dose rate for chronic irradiation. Methods: We compared, for the first time in the same experiment, the effects of chronic (dose rates as low as ~18 and 5 mGy/h) and acute irradiations on clonogenicity and micronucleus formation in AG1522 normal human skin fibroblasts in the confluent state exposed to doses of low- and high-LET radiation (gamma rays and alpha particles) to investigate any differences due to the different radiation quality and different dose rate (in the dose range 0.006-0.9 Gy for alpha particles and 0.4-2.3 Gy for gamma rays). Results: As expected, alpha particles were more effective than gamma rays at inducing cytogenetic damage and reduced clonogenic cell survival. For gamma rays, the cytogenetic damage and the reduction of clonogenic cell survival were greater when the dose was delivered acutely instead of chronically. Instead, for the alpha particles, at the same dose, we found equal cytogenetic damage and reduction of clonogenic cell survival for both chronic and acute exposure (except for the highest doses of 0.4 and 0.9 Gy, where cytogenetic damage is greater at a low dose rate). Conclusion: The results of this study may have an impact on space and terrestrial radioprotection of humans at low doses and low dose rates, on biodosimetry, and on the use of ionizing radiation in medicine. These results also provide insights into understanding damage induction and cell reaction mechanisms following chronic exposure (at dose rates as low as 18 and 5 mGy/h) to low- and high-LET radiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.