ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025
Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopy Myotomy (G-POEM): Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amber Color Imaging: A New Adjunct to Improve POEM Technique.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe number of hospitalizations for gastroparesis has risen over 300% in recent decades with increased physical, psychological, and healthcare burdens. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising therapy for patients with refractory gastroparesis. This article reviews important considerations for G-POEM. RECENT
findingsPredictive factors for clinical success after G-POEM include diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis, shorter gastroparesis duration, symptoms predominant of nausea and emesis, and gastric emptying study showing gastric retention of > 20% at 4 h. Mucosal closure is a critical step for G-POEM; both sutures and clips have high success rates, with clips having a trend to lower success rates but with significantly shorter procedure time and cheaper cost. G-POEMs have an overall 61% pooled success rate at one year with a yearly 13% symptom recurrence rate. A careful patient selection can yield higher clinical success rates. Further studies are needed on variant G-POEM techniques for more durable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39503835What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.