Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505964›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Identification of sentinel lymph node macrometastasis in breast cancer by deep learning based on clinicopathological characteristics.

Daqu Zhang, Miriam Svensson, Patrik Edén, Looket Dihge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daqu ZhangDivision of Computational Science for Health and Environment, Center for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Miriam SvenssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Patrik EdénDivision of Computational Science for Health and Environment, Center for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Looket DihgeDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. looket.dihge@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The axillary lymph node status remains an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, and nodal staging using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routine. Randomized clinical trials provide evidence supporting de-escalation of axillary surgery and omission of SLNB in patients at low risk. However, identifying sentinel lymph node macrometastases (macro-SLNMs) is crucial for planning treatment tailored to the individual patient. This study is the first to explore the capacity of deep learning (DL) models to identify macro-SLNMs based on preoperative clinicopathological characteristics. We trained and validated five multivariable models using a population-based cohort of 18,185 patients. DL models outperform logistic regression, with Transformer showing the strongest results, under the constraint that the sensitivity is no less than 90%, reflecting the sensitivity of SLNB. This highlights the feasibility of noninvasive macro-SLNM prediction using DL. Feature importance analysis revealed that patients with similar characteristics exhibited different nodal status predictions, indicating the need for additional predictors for further improvement.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningLymphatic MetastasisSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAxillaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedBreast cancerClinical decision supportDeep learningLymphatic metastasisSentinel lymph node

Identifiers

PMID39505964
PMCPMC11541545

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.