ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Four putative pathogenic ARHGAP29 variants in patients with non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NsOFC).
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence that disruption of Discoidin domain receptor 2 contributes to palate malformations through effects on the extracellular matrix.Human molecular genetics · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Gene Sequencing Technologies: Unveiling Genetic Architecture of Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts.Genetics research · 2026Review
- Article
- Likely Pathogenic/Pathogenic Variants in the Spliceosome Complex Genes SNRNP200, SF3B1, SF3B2, and SF3B4 Implicated in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Cleft.Human mutation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pathophysiological basis of non-syndromic orofacial cleft (NsOFC) is still largely unclear. However, exome sequencing (ES) has led to identify several causative genes, often with reduced penetrance. Among these, the Rho GTPase activating protein 29 (ARHGAP29) has been previously implicated in 7 families with NsOFC. We investigated a cohort of 224 NsOFCs for which no genetic pathogenic variant had been identified by diagnostic testing. We used ES and bioinformatic variant filtering and identified four novel putative pathogenic variants in ARHGAP29 in four families. One was a missense variant leading to the substitution of the first methionine with threonine, two were heterozygous frameshift variants leading to a premature termination codon, and one was a nonsense variant. All variants were predicted to result in loss of function, either through mRNA decay, truncated ARHGAP29, or abnormal N-terminal initiation of translation of ARHGAP29. The truncated ARHGAP29 proteins would lack the important RhoGAP domain. The variants were either absent or rare in the control population databases, and the loss of intolerance score (pLI) of ARHGAP29 is 1.0, suggesting that ARHGAP29 haploinsufficiency is not tolerated. Phenotypes ranged from microform cleft lip (CL) to complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP), with one unaffected mutation carrier. These results extend the mutational spectrum of ARHGAP29 and show that it is an important gene underlying variable NsOFC phenotypes. ARHGAP29 should be included in diagnostic genetic testing for NsOFC, especially familial cases, as it may be mutated in ∼4% of them (4/97 in our cohort) with high penetrance (89%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.