ArticleBMC surgery2024
Correlation between the ease of cage plates implantation and endplate Hounsfield unit value during ACDF: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The HALP score as a prognostic factor in metastatic biliary cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the correlation between the implantation status of the ROI-C cervical cage plates and the Hounsfield unit(HU) value of the target vertebral endplate during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF)surgery.
methodsReview of patient data undergoing ACDF from January 2018 to December 2021. Data on gender, age, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, alcohol consumption, cervical cage plates status, and HU values of the cervical vertebral endplate. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the HU values and the plates status.
resultsA total of 17 cases (12.1%) had misplaced implants during surgery. There were statistical differences in gender, long-term smoking history, drinking history, and cervical vertebral endplate HU values between the abnormal implantation group and the normal implantation group (P < 0.05). The cervical vertebral endplate HU values in the abnormal implantation group were significantly higher than those in the normal implantation group (729.3 ± 36.2 HU vs. 484.4 ± 59.2 HU, P < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, cervical endplate HU value (OR 1.081; 95% CI 1.016-1.375) was an independent factor influencing improper plate implantation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the cervical endplate HU value in predicting implantation difficulty was 0.836 (P < 0.05), with an optimal threshold of 724 HU (sensitivity 83.2%; specificity 90.4%).
conclusionsThe cervical vertebral segment endplate HU value can independently predict whether the implantation of the plates is misplaced during ACDF surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.