Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506819›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2024

WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators with a focus on antibiotics utilization patterns at outpatient department of Adigrat general hospital, Tigrai, Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Gebretekle Gebremichael Hailesilase, Brhane Gebrehiwot Welegebrial, Mezgebe Gidey Weres, Senait Abera Gebrewahd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gebretekle Gebremichael HailesilaseDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, P.O. Box 50, Adigrat, Tigrai, Ethiopia. ggmsc2009@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-3308
Brhane Gebrehiwot WelegebrialDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, P.O. Box 50, Adigrat, Tigrai, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-7477
Mezgebe Gidey WeresDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, P.O. Box 50, Adigrat, Tigrai, Ethiopia.
Senait Abera GebrewahdDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, P.O. Box 50, Adigrat, Tigrai, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) defines rational use of drug as a state in which medications are received by patients appropriately according to their clinical needs and individual requirement, for adequate period and at the right cost. More than 50% of all medicines are prescribed, dispensed, or sold inappropriately worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the prescribing patterns in Adigrat general hospital, Tigrai, Ethiopia.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was done to evaluate prescription patterns. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select 600 prescriptions and the prescriptions were reviewed using WHO/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs prescribing indicators. Data was collected from prescriptions dispensed from 01 March 2023 to 30 March 2024 at outpatient pharmacy of Adigrat general hospital. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 21 and a p-value < 0.05 was declared statistically significant.

resultsA total of 1088 medicines were prescribed in 600 prescription encounters, giving an average number of 1.8 (± 0.83) medicines per encounter. The percentage of medicines prescribed by generic name was 91.5% while 98.7% of the medicines were prescribed from essential medicine list (EML). Besides, the percentages of encounters containing at least one antibiotic and one injection were 44.5% and 7.2%, respectively. A total of 340 antibiotics were prescribed in 267 encounters. Penicillins (34.4%), macrolides (23.8%) and fluoroquinolones (17.1%) were the most prevalent antibiotics classes. The "Access" and "Watch" groups covered 54.4% and 45.6% of the total antibiotics prescribed, respectively. Being under 18 years old [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 9.830, CI: 4.062-23.786], being prescribed with three medicines (AOR: 3.247, CI: 1.571-6.708) and certain diagnosis like diseases of the respiratory system (AOR: 3.750, CI: 2.136-6.584) were significantly associated with antibiotic prescribing.

conclusionThis study showed deviations of prescribing patterns from WHO standards. The percentage of prescriptions with antibiotic was far from WHO optimal value. The use of antibiotics from "Access" group was below WHO standard. The percentage of medicines prescribed by generic name and the percentage of encounters with injection also deviated from WHO standard. Antibiotics prescribing showed significantly association with age, number of medicines and certain diseases.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHospitals, GeneralPractice Patterns, Physicians'World Health OrganizationAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfantMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotics prescribingAWaReWHO/INRUD prescribing indicators

Identifiers

PMID39506819
PMCPMC11539567

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.