ArticleHeliyon2024
Comprehensive analysis of clinical research profiles and study characteristics of oral potentially malignant disorders: an observational study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aims to present an observational study of clinical trials on Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) and corresponding publications. Study design and setting: We searched the OPMDs-related clinical studies registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database before March 1, 2024. Subsequently, we investigated the publication status of primary completed studies using PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: A total of 185 studies were identified for analysis, including 141 interventional studies and 44 observational studies. The most commonly studied disease type was oral lichen planus (OLP), accounting for 113 studies (61.1 %). Interventional studies on OPMDs were predominantly early-phased, blind, randomized, parallel and single-center. The primary purpose of these studies was treatment (106, 75.2 %). Among the treatments, herbal medicine (21, 19.8 %), photodynamic therapy (17, 16.0 %), and glucocorticoids (14, 13.2 %) were of greatest interest. In addition, 58 (63.0 %) of the primarily completed interventional studies were published, with a median time to publication of 33.6 months. Published interventional studies including OLP patients and factorial designs had shorter time to publication. However, these studies were less frequently published in high-impact journals and most primary results were positive. Conclusions: Clinical trials on OPMDs predominantly focused on OLP and herbal medicine. The quality of studies is unsatisfactory and publication rate is suboptimal. Improvements are needed in ClinicalTrials.gov registration standards, high-quality study design and more stringent publishing requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.