Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507669›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2024

The potential of including the microbiome as biomarker in population-based health studies: methods and benefits.

Florence E Buytaers, Nicolas Berger, Johan Van der Heyden, Nancy H C Roosens, Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florence E BuytaersTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas BergerHealth Information, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Johan Van der HeydenHealth Information, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Nancy H C RoosensTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Sigrid C J De KeersmaeckerTransversal Activities in Applied Genomics, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The key role of our microbiome in influencing our health status, and its relationship with our environment and lifestyle or health behaviors, have been shown in the last decades. Therefore, the human microbiome has the potential to act as a biomarker or indicator of health or exposure to health risks in the general population, if information on the microbiome can be collected in population-based health surveys or cohorts. It could then be associated with epidemiological participant data such as demographic, clinical or exposure profiles. However, to our knowledge, microbiome sampling has not yet been included as biological evidence of health or exposure to health risks in large population-based studies representative of the general population. In this mini-review, we first highlight some practical considerations for microbiome sampling and analysis that need to be considered in the context of a population study. We then present some examples of topics where the microbiome could be included as biological evidence in population-based health studies for the benefit of public health, and how this could be developed in the future. In doing so, we aim to highlight the benefits of having microbiome data available at the level of the general population, combined with epidemiological data from health surveys, and hence how microbiological data could be used in the future to assess human health. We also stress the challenges that remain to be overcome to allow the use of this microbiome data in order to improve proactive public health policies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMicrobiotaHealth StatusHumansPopulation HealthPublic HealthBiomarkersbiomarkerscohortmetagenomicsmicrobiomepopulationpopulation-based health studies

Identifiers

PMID39507669
PMCPMC11538166

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.