ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Osteoporosis: a problem still faulty addressed by the Romanian healthcare system. Results of a questionnaire survey of people aged 40 years and over.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis Beyond Awareness: Cross-National Differences in Preventive Deficits, Pharmacological Exposure, and Risk Clustering in Romania and Tunisia.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Beliefs and Preventive Practices Regarding Osteoporosis: A Cross-Sectional Study in Community Pharmacies in Tunis.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Beyond Bone Mineral Density: Real-World Fracture Risk Profiles and Therapeutic Gaps in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Real-Life Study in Sequential Therapy for Severe Menopausal Osteoporosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Surgical vs. Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the knowledge and awareness level of osteoporosis, its risk factors, the possible causes of underdiagnosis, as well as the preventive measures and lifestyle behavior of the Romanian population. Patients and methods: A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was performed, consisting of an in-person survey, in 10 pharmacies located in both urban and rural settings in Romania. The survey was distributed to patients ≥40 years old. Results: Of 189 respondents, 78.8% were women, the majority age group being 60-69 (31.7%) and 50-59 (30.7%) years old and coming from urban areas (69.3%). Although 75.1% of participants declared knowing about osteoporosis, having a moderate level of knowledge, and women being more aware of the pathology, 77.3% have never performed a DXA test. Moreover, participants already diagnosed with osteoporosis did not show a better disease knowledge than those without a diagnosis. Nearly half of the respondents did not know that a family history of the disease increases the risk of developing it and 60% of them thought that symptoms may develop before a fracture occurs. The preventive strategies tend to be disregarded and thus, underused. Moreover, 42.9% of participants reported being diagnosed with osteoporosis, do not undergo treatment, although they are aware of the existence of effective strategies. The dataset was used to build a participant compatibility network. The network's clustering revealed six relevant communities, which are not correlated with questionnaire results but reflect the patterns of feature associations. Conclusion: Preventive and therapeutic osteoporosis education programs are urgently needed in the Romanian population to decrease disability and high mortality risks and thus, to improve the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.