ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Prognostic value and immunomodulatory role of DNM1L in gastric adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Functions of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Gastric Cancer: From Molecular Processes to Potential Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction as a Targetable Vulnerability in Gastric Cancer: From Carcinogenesis to Apoptosis (A Narrative Review).Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mitochondrial fusion and fission are critical for the morphology and function of cells. DNM1L encodes dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), a key protein mediating mitochondrial fission, which is upregulated in a variety of cancers and is strongly associated with tumorigenesis. We aim to investigate the relationship between DNM1L and the prognosis of gastric cancer, as well as to explore the function and mechanism of DNM1L in gastric cancer (GC). Materials and methods: In this study, we analyzed the expression differences of DNM1L in gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. This was followed by validation through tissue microarrays. We then utilized the cohort information from these microarrays to explore the relationship between DNM1L expression and gastric cancer prognosis. Furthermore, we conducted enrichment analysis to investigate the function and mechanisms of DNM1L in gastric cancer, and lastly, we performed immune cell infiltration analysis using the CIBERSORT algorithm. Results: We discovered that the expression of DNM1L is elevated in GC tissues. TCGA data showed that the overexpression of DNM1L was positively correlated with the T-stage of GC but not with lymph node metastasis, which was also corroborated by our immunohistochemistry experiments. Based on the Kaplan-Meier curves, the high DNM1L expression was remarkably correlated with poor overall survival in patients with GC. In addition, results of COX regression analysis indicated that high DNM1L expression was an independent prognostic factor in patients with GC. Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that DNM1L was closely associated with multiple signaling pathways and immune responses. CIBERSORT analysis indicated that increased DNM1L expression may affect the infiltration of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that DNM1L is upregulated in gastric cancer (GC) and positively correlates with the T-stage and poor prognosis of GC patients, and it plays an important role in tumor immune infiltration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.