Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39507855›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024

Robotic buccal mucosal graft ureteroplasty using combination of posterior-inlay and anterior-onlay technique.

Silu Chen, Kunlin Yang, Zhenyu Li, Zhihua Li, Zihao Tao, Yiming Zhang, Xiang Wang, Xuesong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Robotic-Assisted Redo Pyeloplasty for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silu Chen *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Kunlin Yang *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Zhenyu Li *Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Zhihua LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Zihao TaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Yiming ZhangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, particularly with the anterior-onlay technique, shows promise for treating complex ureteral strictures. However, long and circumferential strictures remain challenging. This study aimed to present the surgical technique of the posterior-inlay and anterior-onlay technique in robotic ureteroplasty with a BMG (RU-BMG). A 37-year-old male patient with a medical background of failed laparoscopic ureteroplasty and multiple endourological interventions was admitted to our hospital. Preoperative anterograde and retrograde pyelography revealed a 5-cm ureteral stricture. During the surgical procedure, the ureteral posterior wall was insufficient to facilitate a complete posterior augmented anastomosis, resulting in a posterior defect subsequent to the partial posterior augmented anastomosis. Ultimately, a BMG was utilized to address the posterior defect initially, followed by anterior-onlay ureteroplasty with a BMG. The Foley catheter was removed 2 weeks after surgery, while the nephrostomy tube was clamped on postoperative day 14. The double-J stent was removed 3 months after surgery. The preoperative serum creatine was 102.9 μmol/L. The surgery was performed successfully within 240 min, with estimated blood loss of 100 mL. The postoperative hospitalization was 4 days. Throughout the 12-month follow-up period, no symptoms or complications were observed, with a serum creatine of 82.0 μmol/L. Computed tomography urography indicated relieved hydronephrosis. In conclusion, RU-BMG using a combination of posterior-inlay and anterior-onlay technique is safe and feasible in the management of ureteral stricture. More cases and longer follow-up for this procedure are needed for better perfection of this procedure.

Indexed as

Buccal mucosal graft (BMG)reconstructive surgeryrobotic ureteroplasty (RU)ureteral stricture

Identifiers

PMID39507855
PMCPMC11535729

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.