ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Saliva-based point-of-care assay to measure the concentration of pyrazinamide using a mobile UV spectrophotometer.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saliva as an Alternative Matrix for Pharmacokinetic Research and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Antituberculosis Drug Pyrazinamide.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic modelling as a tool to assess TB treatment adherence: application to the REMEMBER study.IJTLD open · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Improving Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- A Call to Action: Empowering Pharmacists in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Management.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPyrazinamide, one of the first-line antituberculosis drugs, displays variability in drug exposure that is associated with treatment response. A simple, low-cost assay may be helpful to optimize treatment. This study aimed to develop and validate a point-of-care assay to quantify the concentration of pyrazinamide in saliva.
methodsAll measurements were conducted using the nano-volume drop function on the mobile ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer (NP80, Implen, Germany). Assay development involved applying second derivative spectroscopy in combination with the Savitzky-Golay filter between wavelengths of 200-300 nm to increase spectral resolution. Assay validation included assessing selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, carry-over and matrix effects. Specificity was also analysed by evaluating the impact of co-administered medications on pyrazinamide results. Sample stability was measured at various temperatures up to 40°C.
resultsThe calibration curve (7.5-200 mg/L) was linear (R2 = 0.9991). The overall accuracy (bias%) and precision (CV%) ranged from -0.66% to 5.15%, and 0.56% to 4.95%, respectively. Carry-over and matrix effects were both acceptable with a bias% of <±4% and CV% of <7.5%. Commonly co-administered medications displayed negligible interferences. Levofloxacin displayed analytical interference (bias% = -10.21%) at pyrazinamide concentrations < 25 mg/L, but this will have little clinical implications. Pyrazinamide was considered stable in saliva after 7 days in all storage conditions with a CV% of <6.5% and bias% of <±10.5% for both low- and high-quality control concentrations.
conclusionsA saliva-based assay for pyrazinamide has been successfully developed and validated using the mobile UV spectrophotometer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.