Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39509319›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Immune Checkpoints in B Cells: Unlocking New Potentials in Cancer Treatment.

Xiaoye Shi, Xiangshu Cheng, Aimin Jiang, Wenjie Shi, Lingxuan Zhu, Weiming Mou, Antonino Glaviano, Zaoqu Liu, Quan Cheng, Anqi Lin and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. TSPAN4Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaoye ShiDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Xiangshu ChengCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Road. Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongiiang, 150076, China.
Aimin JiangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, 200433, China.
Wenjie ShiMolecular and Experimental Surgery, University Clinic for General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Trans-Plantation Surgery, Medical Faculty University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von Guericke University, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lingxuan ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Weiming MouDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Antonino GlavianoDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, 90123, Italy.
Zaoqu LiuInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Quan ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Anqi LinDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.
Linhui WangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, 200433, China.
Peng LuoDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8215-2045

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82372883;2022YFB4700904Shanghai Key Laboratory of Urologic Diseases No.2022ZZ01011Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty No.SHDC2022CRT006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B cells are crucial component of humoral immunity, and their role in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) has garnered significant attention in recent years. These cells hold great potential and application prospects in the field of tumor immunotherapy. Research has demonstrated that the TME can remodel various B cell functions, including proliferation, differentiation, antigen presentation, and antibody production, thereby invalidating the anti-tumor effects of B cells. Concurrently, numerous immune checkpoints (ICs) on the surface of B cells are upregulated. Aberrant B-cell IC signals not only impair the function of B cells themselves, but also modulate the tumor-killing effects of other immune cells, ultimately fostering an immunosuppressive TME and facilitating tumor immune escape. Blocking ICs on B cells is beneficial for reversing the immunosuppressive TME and restoring anti-tumor immune responses. In this paper, the intricate connection between B-cell ICs and the TME is delved into, emphasizing the critical role of targeting B-cell ICs in anti-tumor immunity, which may provide valuable insights for the future development of tumor immunotherapy based on B cells.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint Proteinsantitumor immunityB cellimmune checkpoint (IC)immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)tumor immune microenvironment (TME)

Identifiers

PMID39509319
PMCPMC11653663

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.