Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39510550›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Research agenda for ending preventable maternal deaths from postpartum haemorrhage: a WHO research prioritisation exercise.

Caitlin R Williams, Guervan Adnet, Ioannis D Gallos, Arri Coomarasamy, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Md Asiful Islam, Sara Rushwan, Mariana Widmer, Fernando Althabe, Olufemi T Oladapo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FIGO call to action: Multisectoral approach to postpartum hemorrhage.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caitlin R WilliamsDepartment of Mother and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4925-869X
Guervan AdnetBoston Consulting Group, Paris, France.
Ioannis D GallosUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland gallosi@who.int.
Arri CoomarasamyWHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ahmet Metin GülmezogluConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-0998
Md Asiful IslamWHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-6473
Sara RushwanConcept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mariana WidmerUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Fernando AlthabeUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Olufemi T OladapoUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains the leading cause of maternal death. Yet there is a lack of clarity around what research is needed to determine what works and how best to deliver proven PPH interventions. This article describes a WHO-led effort to develop a global PPH research agenda for 2023-2030, to reinvigorate research and innovation while avoiding duplication and waste.

methodsPotential questions were culled from evidence gaps in a forthcoming Lancet PPH series, a pipeline analysis on PPH medicines and devices, international PPH guidelines, previous research prioritisation efforts and submissions from a reference group of PPH experts and stakeholders. Questions were deduplicated and consolidated, categorised into three tracks (innovation, implementation and cross-cutting) and subjected to an online prioritisation survey. Survey participants (n=120) assessed these questions using five criteria (answerability, effectiveness, deliverability, maximum potential for disease burden reduction and equity) following the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative methodology. The outcome of this exercise was complemented by an in-person consensus meeting (Global PPH Summit from 7 March 2023 to 10 March 2023 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates) to finalise the research agenda.

resultsFifteen research questions (five per track) were identified as top priority. The top question per track called for research on the comparative effectiveness and safety of alternative routes of administration (other than the intravenous route) of tranexamic acid in the treatment of PPH (innovation); identifying barriers and facilitators affecting the adoption and use of evidence-based recommendations for PPH management (implementation) and the effectiveness of a strategy of early detection and first response treatment using a bundle of recommended interventions for improving PPH-related outcomes (cross-cutting).

conclusionThis shared research agenda should guide future investments into PPH studies with high potential to transform policy and clinical practice in the near term to medium term. Funding for the new research priorities is urgently needed.

Indexed as

Postpartum HemorrhageWorld Health OrganizationBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansMaternal DeathMaternal MortalityPregnancyResearchDecision MakingMaternal healthObstetricsOther study design

Identifiers

PMID39510550
PMCPMC11552529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.