ReviewAnesthesia and pain medicine2024
Sugammadex for our little ones: a brief narrative review.
Review in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06962007 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Incidence, Severity, and Risk Factors of Clenching Induced by Sugammadex During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Incidence, Severity, and Risk Factors of Clenching Induced by Sugammadex During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Error Traps in Pediatric Neuromuscular Block.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Review
- From visibility to influence.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Using Sugammadex in Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Sugammadex and emergence-related respiratory adverse events in pediatric tonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Age-Specific Pharmacology of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugammadex, the first noncompetitive antagonist developed for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB), is one of the few drugs that has revolutionized anesthetic practice. However, the use of sugammadex for children between the ages of 2 and 17 years has only recently been approved and is currently not approved for children under the age of 2 years. Although the precision and reliability of reversal of NMB with sugammadex are of great benefit in pediatric anesthesia, several important questions remain regarding its use in our youngest patients. In this brief narrative review, we aim to provide an overview of the key considerations and potential challenges that anesthesiologists often face when using sugammadex in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.