Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39512411›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2024

Analysis of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cervical Cancer Differentially Expressed Genes and Identification of Prognostic Factors using Integrated Bioinformatics Approaches.

Saba Hatefi-Shogae, Modjtaba Emadi-Baygi, Rasoul Ghaedi-Heydari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saba Hatefi-ShogaeDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Modjtaba Emadi-BaygiDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Rasoul Ghaedi-HeydariDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cervical cancer progresses through a series of steps. Despite our limited understanding of the mechanisms driving this progression, identifying the key genes involved could significantly improve early detection and treatment. Materials and Methods: Two gene expression profiles of GSE9750 and GSE6791, which included cervical cancer HPV-positive and -negative samples, were evaluated using the R limma package with established cut-off criteria of Results: Considering the defined criteria, 115 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. The DEG's KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed enrichment in highly relevant pathways to the HPV infection, including cell cycle, viral carcinogenesis, autophagy-animal, Epstein-Barr virus infection, human T-cell leukemia virus 1 infection, and microRNAs in cancer. WGCNA results in 13 co-expression modules, and the magenta module is identified with significant relations to HPV, cervical cancer stage, and metastasis traits. The survival analysis identified Conclusion: The innovation of our work lies in identifying essential genes associated with the multi-step process of cervical carcinogenesis. In fact, the current study has the potential to give a distinct viewpoint on the molecular pathways linked to cervical cancer. Considering the potential importance of the hub genes, we recommend conducting in-depth wet lab research to determine their impact on the biological mechanisms of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

BEX1CDC45cell cyclecervical cancergene expressiongene modulesgene networksHPV

Identifiers

PMID39512411
PMCPMC11542694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.