ArticleScientific reports2024
Genetic correlation between fetal nuchal translucency thickening and cystic hygroma and exploration of pregnancy outcome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Utility of Sequence-Based Genetic Testing for Fetal Edema Following Non-Diagnostic Microarray Results: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Association Between Fetal Nuchal Translucency Measurements and Pregnancy Outcomes.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Clinical application of fetal Nuchal Translucency combined with noninvasive prenatal testing in screening chromosome abnormalities.PloS one · 2026Article
- Perinatal outcomes of resolved fetal cystic hygromas.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- The impact of increased nuchal translucency on pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cohort study in Qatar.Qatar medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) are increasingly utilized in prenatal diagnosis of abnormal ultrasound findings, but studies on correlation between pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) and single-gene mutations in fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) thickening/cystic hygroma (CH), and pregnancy outcomes, are rare. This study aimed to investigate clinical value of CMA and WES for NT thickening/CH in fetuses, explore genetic correlation between fetal NT thickening and CH, and analyze pregnancy outcomes. We retrospectively selected 215 pregnant women diagnosed with fetal NT thickening (NT > 95th)/CH who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis at our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022. With negative chromosomal karyotype analysis (KA) and CMA results, patients voluntarily underwent WES. Patients were grouped by NT thickening/CH, and application value of KA, CMA, and WES examined. Ultrasound findings, pregnancy outcomes, and fetal growth post-birth were followed during mid/late pregnancy and post-delivery. Abnormalities in chromosomal number were detected in 28 of 215 samples, with a detection rate of 13.0%, and pCNVs were detected in 12 cases, with a detection rate of 5.6%. The most common abnormality in fetuses from both groups suggested by CMA was 22q11.21 microdeletion-microduplication syndrome. 35 patients with negative KA and CMA results underwent WES, and single gene variants were detected in 12 fetuses, with an abnormality rate of 34.3%. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was 28.2% in the NT thickening group and 82.9% in the CH group (P < 0.05). Overall, fetal NT thickening/CH was associated with genetic abnormalities, WES further improved the diagnosis of abnormal fetuses after negative KA and CMA results in both groups, and the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was lower in the NT thickening group than in the CH group. The management of pregnancy outcomes could guide clinical genetic counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.