Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516256›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning for 3D vascular segmentation in hierarchical phase contrast tomography: a case study on kidney.

Ekin Yagis, Shahab Aslani, Yashvardhan Jain, Yang Zhou, Shahrokh Rahmani, Joseph Brunet, Alexandre Bellier, Christopher Werlein, Maximilian Ackermann, Danny Jonigk and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AMR-VSF: an adaptive memory correction framework for robust 3D CT aorta segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Human Organ Atlas.Science advances · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Human Organ Atlas.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ekin YagisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. e.yagis@ucl.ac.uk.
Shahab Aslani *Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Yashvardhan Jain *Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Yang ZhouDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Shahrokh RahmaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Joseph BrunetDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Alexandre BellierLaboratoire d'Anatomie Des Alpes Françaises, Grenoble, France.
Christopher WerleinInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Maximilian AckermannInstitute of Functional and Clinical Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Danny JonigkInstitute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Paul Tafforeau *European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Peter D Lee *Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Claire L Walsh *Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

SenNet Supplement - Consortium BenchmarkingU24CA268108 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Philip D. Blood, JONATHAN C. SILVERSTEIN · 2021 to 2026
$22.1M
ConProject-002U2CDK114886 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KRETZLER, MATTHIAS · 2017 to 2021
$21.0M
KPMP Kidney Mapping and Atlas Project (KMAP)U01DK133090 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jonathan Himmelfarb, Matthias Kretzler · 2022 to 2026
$10.4M
3D Multiscale Biomolecular Human Reference Atlas Construction, Visualization and Usage [4 of 5]OT2OD033756 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BORNER, KATY · 2022 to 2025
$7.4M
The Human Body Atlas: High-Resolution, Functional Mapping of Voxel, Vector, and Meta DatasetsOT2OD026671 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BORNER, KATY · 2018 to 2021
$3.5M
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases ATLAS (D2K-ATLAS) Center as an accessible, comprehensive data portfolio for renal and genitourinary development and diseaseU24DK135157 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, SANJAY, VALERIUS, MICHAEL TODD · 2022 to 2023
$3.4M
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF 2020-225394Medical Research Council MR/R025673/1NCI NIH HHS U24 CA268108NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK133090NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK135157NIDDK NIH HHS U2C DK114886NIH HHS OT2 OD026671NIH HHS OT2 OD033756SVCF, the MRC MR/R025673/1the Wellcome Trust 209553/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated blood vessel segmentation is critical for biomedical image analysis, as vessel morphology changes are associated with numerous pathologies. Still, precise segmentation is difficult due to the complexity of vascular structures, anatomical variations across patients, the scarcity of annotated public datasets, and the quality of images. Our goal is to provide a foundation on the topic and identify a robust baseline model for application to vascular segmentation using a new imaging modality, Hierarchical Phase-Contrast Tomography (HiP-CT). We begin with an extensive review of current machine-learning approaches for vascular segmentation across various organs. Our work introduces a meticulously curated training dataset, verified by double annotators, consisting of vascular data from three kidneys imaged using HiP-CT as part of the Human Organ Atlas Project. HiP-CT pioneered at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in 2020, revolutionizes 3D organ imaging by offering a resolution of around 20 μm/voxel and enabling highly detailed localised zooms up to 1-2 μm/voxel without physical sectioning. We leverage the nnU-Net framework to evaluate model performance on this high-resolution dataset, using both known and novel samples, and implementing metrics tailored for vascular structures. Our comprehensive review and empirical analysis on HiP-CT data sets a new standard for evaluating machine learning models in high-resolution organ imaging. Our three experiments yielded Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores of 0.9523, 0.9410, and 0.8585, respectively. Nevertheless, DSC primarily assesses voxel-to-voxel concordance, overlooking several crucial characteristics of the vessels and should not be the sole metric for deciding the performance of vascular segmentation. Our results show that while segmentations yielded reasonably high scores-such as centerline DSC ranging from 0.82 to 0.88, certain errors persisted. Specifically, large vessels that collapsed due to the lack of hydrostatic pressure (HiP-CT is an ex vivo technique) were segmented poorly. Moreover, decreased connectivity in finer vessels and higher segmentation errors at vessel boundaries were observed. Such errors, particularly in significant vessels, obstruct the understanding of the structures by interrupting vascular tree connectivity. Our study establishes the benchmark across various evaluation metrics, for vascular segmentation of HiP-CT imaging data, an imaging technology that has the potential to substantively shift our understanding of human vascular networks.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalKidneyTomography, X-Ray ComputedBlood VesselsHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted3D vascular segmentationDeep learningSemantic segmentationX-ray tomography

Identifiers

PMID39516256
PMCPMC11549215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.