ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis (the MSUG94 group).
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy reduces biochemical recurrence risk and improves urinary continence recovery compared with laparoscopic approach in high-risk localized prostate cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a real-world propensity score-matched analysis.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in combination with radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Modern Treatment of Skeletal Metastases: Multidisciplinarity and the Concept of Oligometastasis in the Recent Literature.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe optimal neoadjuvant regimen before radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be determined. This retrospective multicenter cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with HR-PCa undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).
methodsWe reviewed the datasets of 1023 subjects who underwent RALP at nine Japanese facilities between September 2012 and October 2023. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups using propensity score matching: a RALP-alone group and those who underwent NCHT followed by RALP (NCHT group). The NCHT regimen consisted of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist and tegafur-uracil for at least 3 months before RALP. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RALP. The secondary endpoint was the surgical specimen pathology findings.
resultsPropensity score matching identified 139 individuals for each group. Median follow-up was 18.2 months. During follow-up, BCR was observed in 41 patients (29.5%) in the RALP-alone group and 22 patients (15.8%) in the NCHT group (p = 0.010). Pathological results showed significantly more organ-confined PCa and significantly fewer positive surgical margins or lymphovascular invasion in the NCHT group than in the RALP-alone group. The 2-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) was 72.7% and 74.7% in the RALP-alone and NCHT groups, respectively (p = 0.086). Two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 liver disorder as an NCHT-related adverse event.
conclusionThe results suggest that NCHT can safely treat HR-PCa and may reduce the incidence of BCR when combined with RALP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39516348What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.