ReviewCancers2024
Membrane Antigen Targeting in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Antibodies or CAR-T Cells.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancement of CD117-Targeted Bispecific T-cell Engagement by CD33-Targeted Bispecific T-cell Costimulation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Emerging strategies in CAR-T cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: overcoming heterogeneity and improving safety through dual-antigen targeting.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Integrated single-cell and transcriptome sequencing data reveal the value of IL1RAP in gastric cancer microenvironment and prognosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores the emerging area of the therapeutic use of antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Through a detailed analysis of the existing literature, this paper highlights the different categories of AML antigens for immunotherapeutic targeting, the most recent applications on antibodies, including bispecific immune cell engagers and CAR-T cells, to the therapy of patients with refractory/relapsing AML The studies performed in AML patients using BisAbs and CAR-T cells have shown that only a limited number of AML patients show sustained responses to these therapies, thus underlying AML heterogeneity as a major challenge. Several studies have addressed the potential mechanisms underlying the resistance of AMLs to antibody-directed immunotherapies. A better understanding of the barriers hampering the successful development of AML immunotherapy is required. However, in spite of the limitations, the studies recently carried out have shown the peculiar sensitivity of some AML subtypes to immunotherapy and have provided the basis for future studies, such as multiplex antigen targeting, which hold the promise of successful development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.