Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518425›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

AI-Assisted Detection and Localization of Spinal Metastatic Lesions.

Edgars Edelmers, Artūrs Ņikuļins, Klinta Luīze Sprūdža, Patrīcija Stapulone, Niks Saimons Pūce, Elizabete Skrebele, Everita Elīna Siņicina, Viktorija Cīrule, Ance Kazuša, Katrina Boločko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edgars EdelmersFaculty of Medicine, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-4426
Artūrs ŅikuļinsFaculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.
Klinta Luīze SprūdžaFaculty of Medicine, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia.
Patrīcija StapuloneFaculty of Medicine, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia.
Niks Saimons PūceFaculty of Computer Science, Information Technology and Energy, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.
Elizabete SkrebeleFaculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0003-0384-7397
Everita Elīna SiņicinaFaculty of Biology, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia.
Viktorija CīruleDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia.
Ance KazušaFaculty of Medicine, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0009-4699-813X
Katrina BoločkoDepartment of Computer Graphics and Computer Vision, Riga Technical University, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-0729-8009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe integration of machine learning and radiomics in medical imaging has significantly advanced diagnostic and prognostic capabilities in healthcare. This study focuses on developing and validating an artificial intelligence (AI) model using U-Net architectures for the accurate detection and segmentation of spinal metastases from computed tomography (CT) images, addressing both osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions.

methodsOur methodology employs multiple variations of the U-Net architecture and utilizes two distinct datasets: one consisting of 115 polytrauma patients for vertebra segmentation and another comprising 38 patients with documented spinal metastases for lesion detection.

resultsThe model demonstrated strong performance in vertebra segmentation, achieving Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) values between 0.87 and 0.96. For metastasis segmentation, the model achieved a DSC of 0.71 and an F-beta score of 0.68 for lytic lesions but struggled with sclerotic lesions, obtaining a DSC of 0.61 and an F-beta score of 0.57, reflecting challenges in detecting dense, subtle bone alterations. Despite these limitations, the model successfully identified isolated metastatic lesions beyond the spine, such as in the sternum, indicating potential for broader skeletal metastasis detection.

conclusionsThe study concludes that AI-based models can augment radiologists' capabilities by providing reliable second-opinion tools, though further refinements and diverse training data are needed for optimal performance, particularly for sclerotic lesion segmentation. The annotated CT dataset produced and shared in this research serves as a valuable resource for future advancements.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer tomographyinstance segmentationmedical imagingradiomicsspinal metastasesvertebrae segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39518425
PMCPMC11545154

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.