Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39521453›Full record

Trial reportLupus science & medicine2024

Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS.

Maria Dall'Era, Kenneth Kalunian, Neil Solomons, Matt Truman, Lucy S Hodge, Ernie Yap, Anca D Askanase

Abstract readComparative StudyClinical Trial, Phase IIIClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lupus science & medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Dall'EraUniversity of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kenneth KalunianUniversity of California San Diego Health Sciences, La Jolla, California, USA.
Neil SolomonsFormerly of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Matt TrumanAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lucy S HodgeAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-9235-7491
Ernie YapAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada eyap@auriniapharma.com.
Anca D AskanaseColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-5023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh-dose glucocorticoid (GC)-based dual immunosuppressive treatment regimens are still frequently used in active lupus nephritis (LN) despite their known association with dose-dependent toxicities and incomplete efficacy. We hypothesised that the addition of voclosporin to low-dose GCs and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would reduce exposure to the toxicities of high-dose GC-based dual immunosuppressive therapy regimens, resulting in an improved safety profile without compromising efficacy.

methodsPropensity score matching generated two groups of matched participants from the voclosporin arms (in combination with MMF (2 g/day) and low-dose GCs) of the Phase 2 AURA-LV and Phase 3 AURORA 1 studies and the MMF (3 g/day) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) arms (both in combination with high-dose GCs) of the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) induction study. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed over 6 months.

resultsThere were 179 matched participants identified between the AURA-LV/AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS; more voclosporin-treated participants reported AEs by preferred term of glomerular filtration rate decreased, hypertension and anaemia. The incidence of serious AEs was similar across treatments. There were four (2.2%) deaths in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS compared with seven (3.9%) deaths in voclosporin-treated participants. Significantly more voclosporin-treated participants achieved a ≥25% reduction in urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) from baseline at 3 months and ≥50% reduction in UPCR from baseline at 6 months.

conclusionsCompared with the high-dose GC-based regimens used in ALMS, voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy resulted in fewer AEs overall and greater and earlier reductions in proteinuria over the first 6 months of treatment. These data reinforce the feasibility of using low doses of GCs and MMF to treat LN when combined with voclosporin as a third agent.

Indexed as

CyclosporineDrug Therapy, CombinationGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus NephritisMycophenolic AcidPropensity ScoreAdultCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCyclophosphamideCyclosporineGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidvoclosporinGlucocorticoidsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus Nephritis

Identifiers

PMID39521453
PMCPMC11552023

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.