ArticleScientific reports2024
DNA origami drives gene expression in a human cell culture system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Treatment of Degenerative Eye Diseases at the Nanoscale.Smart medicine · 2026Review
- DNA Origami and Its Applications in Synthetic Biology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Review
- A novel foldable metamaterial for application in the pipeline pressure vessel with a static deformation, strain and stress analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-assembling DNA nanoparticles have the potential to significantly advance the targeted delivery of molecular cargo owing to their chemical and architectural flexibility. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the genetic code embedded in DNA nanoparticles produced by the method of DNA origami or related techniques can be recognized and copied by RNA polymerase in vitro. Further, sculpted DNA nanoparticles can serve as a substrate for Cas9-mediated gene modification and gene expression in cell culture. In the present study, we further investigate the ability of DNA origami nanoparticles to be expressed in a human cell line with emphasis on the impact of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) domains and the contributions of the architectural disposition of genetic control elements, namely promoter and enhancer sequences. Our findings suggest that while cells possess the remarkable capability to express genes within highly folded architectures, the presence and relative density and location of ssDNA domains appears to influence overall levels of gene expression. These results suggest that it may be possible to nuance folded DNA nanoparticle architecture to regulate the rate and/or level of gene expression. Considering the highly malleable architecture and chemistry of self-assembling DNA nanoparticles, these findings motivate further exploration of their potential as an economic nanotechnology platform for targeted gene editing, nucleic acid-based vaccines, and related biotherapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.