ArticleStem cell research & therapy2024
Post-symptomatic administration of hMSCs exerts therapeutic effects in SCA2 mice.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Cerebellar Ataxia: From Bench to Bedside.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Therapeutic targeting of blood-derived protein infiltration to modulate neuroinflammation in cerebellar ataxia.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Application of Neurotrophic Factors as a Therapeutic Approach for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Experimental neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDefects in the ataxin-2 (ATXN-2) protein and CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in its coding gene, Atxn-2, cause the neurodegenerative disorder spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2). While clinical studies suggest potential benefits of human-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) for treating various ataxias, the exact mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effects and interaction with host tissue to stimulate neurotrophin expression remain unclear specifically in the context of SCA2.
methodsHuman bone marrow-derived MSCs (hMSCs) were injected into the cisterna magna of 26-week-old wild-type and SCA2 mice. Mice were assessed for impaired motor coordination using the accelerating rotarod, open field test, and composite phenotype scoring. At 50 weeks, the cerebellum vermis was harvested for protein assessment and immunohistochemical analysis.
resultsSignificant loss of NeuN and calbindin was observed in 25-week-old SCA2 mice. However, after receiving multiple injections of hMSCs starting at 26 weeks of age, these mice exhibited a significant improvement in abnormal motor performance and a protective effect on Purkinje cells. This beneficial effect persisted until the mice reached 50 weeks of age, at which point they were sacrificed to study further mechanistic events triggered by the administration of hMSCs. Calbindin-positive cells in the Purkinje cell layer expressed bone-derived neurotrophic factor after hMSC administration, contributing to the protection of cerebellar neurons from cell death.
conclusionIn conclusion, repeated administration of hMSCs shows promise in alleviating SCA2 symptoms by preserving Purkinje cells, improving neurotrophic support, and reducing inflammation, ultimately leading to the preservation of locomotor function in SCA2 mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.