Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39522087›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2024

A novel double fusion of EML4-ALK and PLEKHA7-ALK contribute to rapid progression of lung adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review.

Zhongzhao Wang, Yang Luo, Heng Gong, Yang Chen, Hao Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhongzhao Wang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Yang Luo *School of Basic Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Heng GongSchool of Basic Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China. chenyxcxw@163.com.
Hao TangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China. tanghao_0921@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 40-year-old male with EML4-ALK (E6:A20) fusion variant 3 and previously unreported PLEKHA7-ALK (P3:A20) fusion in lung adenocarcinoma exhibited resistance to alectinib and chemotherapy. Subsequent next-generation sequencing (NGS) from the plasma specimen revealed the co-existing mutation in the KEAP1 gene, which may represent an intrinsic resistance to ALK-TKI. Furthermore, the presence of double fusion PLEKHA7-ALK (P3:A20) may also have played a critical role in the resistance to alectinib. KEAP1 mutation (p.E244K) was also founded in this patient which may lead to resistance to standard chemotherapy. The patient was then treated with brigatinib, which effectively halted the rapid progression. Unfortunately, the patient deceased to uncontrollable, rapidly progressing pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism, resulting in an overall survival of 9 months. This represents the rare case of NSCLC with a double fusion of EML4-ALK and PLEKHA7-ALK, exhibiting resistance to alectinib and chemotherapy. Our case suggests that the double fusion of EML4-ALK and PLEKHA7-ALK and co-existing KEAP1 mutation may serve as an adverse prognostic factor. Additionally, brigatinib may offer a potential treatment option for lung adenocarcinoma patients with PLEKHA7-ALK (P3:A20) fusion.

Indexed as

ALK fusionBrigatinibEML4-ALKNGSPLEKHA7-ALK

Identifiers

PMID39522087
PMCPMC11551082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.