Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39525085›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Biased activation of the vasopressin V2 receptor probed by molecular dynamics simulations, NMR and pharmacological studies.

Aurélien Fouillen, Pierre Couvineau, Gérald Gaibelet, Stéphanie Riché, Hélène Orcel, Christiane Mendre, Ali Kanso, Romain Lanotte, Julie Nguyen, Juliette Dimon and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Elucidating biased signaling in class A GPCRs.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Aurélien FouillenInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Pierre CouvineauInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Gérald GaibeletInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Stéphanie RichéLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR7200 CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Institut du Médicament de Strasbourg, 67412 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France.
Hélène OrcelInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Christiane MendreInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Ali KansoInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Romain LanotteInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Julie NguyenInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Juliette DimonInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Serge UrbachInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Rémy SounierInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Sébastien GranierInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Dominique BonnetLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR7200 CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Institut du Médicament de Strasbourg, 67412 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France.
Xiaojing CongInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Bernard MouillacInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Hélène DéménéCentre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), Univ Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, 34090, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control critical cell signaling. Their response to extracellular stimuli involves conformational changes to convey signals to intracellular effectors, among which the most important are G proteins and β-arrestins (βArrs). Biased activation of one pathway is a field of intense research in GPCR pharmacology. Combining NMR, site-directed mutagenesis, molecular pharmacology, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we studied the conformational diversity of the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) bound to different types of ligands: the antagonist Tolvaptan, the endogenous unbiased agonist arginine-vasopressin, and MCF14, a partial Gs protein-biased agonist. A double-labeling NMR scheme was developed to study the receptor conformational changes and ligand binding: V2R was subjected to lysine

Indexed as

Biased ActivationEnhanced samplingG-protein coupled receptorMolecular dynamicsNMRPharmacology

Identifiers

PMID39525085
PMCPMC11550766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.