ReviewCureus2024
Surgical Technique and Fertility Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of Open and Laparoscopic Cystectomy in Women of Reproductive Age.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cystectomy, the surgical removal of ovarian tissue, is commonly performed in women of reproductive age to address conditions such as ovarian cysts, endometriosis, and tumors. The choice of surgical technique, open versus laparoscopic, has significant implications for postoperative recovery and long-term fertility outcomes. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the current literature on the effects of these two surgical approaches on fertility in women of reproductive age. Open cystectomy, while effective, is associated with larger incisions, increased trauma to surrounding reproductive structures, and a higher incidence of postoperative complications, which may negatively impact future fertility. In contrast, laparoscopic cystectomy offers a minimally invasive option that generally results in less postoperative pain, quicker recovery, and potentially improved fertility outcomes due to reduced damage to surrounding tissues. However, the literature reveals a complex interplay between surgical technique, underlying medical conditions, and individual patient factors that can influence reproductive potential. This review synthesizes key studies comparing the fertility outcomes of both surgical methods, highlighting the need for individualized surgical planning based on each patient's unique circumstances and reproductive goals. Additionally, it discusses the importance of preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approaches to optimize patient outcomes. Future research is essential to further clarify the long-term fertility implications of open and laparoscopic cystectomy and to refine surgical techniques to enhance reproductive health. This review contributes to the growing body of evidence guiding clinicians in making informed decisions that prioritize the effective treatment of ovarian pathology and fertility preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.