Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39526069›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Influence of rescuer position and arm angle on chest compression quality: An international multicentric randomized crossover simulation trial.

Abel Nicolau, Ingrid Bispo, Marc Lazarovici, Christoffer Ericsson, Pedro Sa-Couto, Inês Jorge, Pedro Vieira-Marques, Carla Sa-Couto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abel NicolauCINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Ingrid BispoCINTESIS@RISE, Community Medicine, Information and Decision Sciences Department (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Marc LazaroviciInstitut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (INM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Germany.
Christoffer EricssonArcada University of Applied Sciences, School of Business and Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland.
Pedro Sa-CoutoCenter for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Department of Mathematics (DMAT), University of Aveiro, Portugal.
Inês JorgeCINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Pedro Vieira-MarquesCINTESIS@RISE, Community Medicine, Information and Decision Sciences Department (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Carla Sa-CoutoCINTESIS@RISE, Community Medicine, Information and Decision Sciences Department (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Success in resuscitation depends not only on the timeliness of the maneuvers but also on the quality of chest compressions. Factors such as the rescuer position and arm angle can significantly impact compression quality. Aim: This study explores the influence of rescuer positioning and arm angle on the quality of chest compressions among healthcare professionals experienced in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods: In this international, multicentric, randomized crossover simulation trial with independent groups, healthcare professionals were assigned to one of four positions: kneeling on the floor, standing, standing on a step stool, and kneeling on the bed. Participants performed two 3-minute trials of uninterrupted chest compressions at arm angles of 90° and 105°. Compression quality was assessed, using manikin derived data. Results: A total of 76 participants entered the study. Those using a 90° arm angle exhibited higher compression scores than those at a 105° angle. Rescuers standing on a step stool maintained higher scores over time when compared to other groups. In contrast, rescuers kneeling on the bed consistently scored below 75% throughout the trial, with particularly low scores at the 105° angle. Conclusion: Rescuer position and arm angle significantly influence CPR quality, with a 90° arm angle and elevated positioning optimizing compression depth and effectiveness. The results recommend against kneeling on the bed due to its negative impact on chest compression quality.

Indexed as

Arm angleCardiopulmonary resuscitationChest compressions qualityCPRPhysical activityRescuer positionSimulation

Identifiers

PMID39526069
PMCPMC11550126

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.