Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39527293›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2024

Auto-Global Examination of Mental State (Auto-GEMS): a web-based self-administered cognitive screening.

Veronica Pucci, Giulio Contemori, Maria Silvia Saccani, Giorgio Arcara, Sara Mondini, Mario Bonato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronica PucciDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology and Socialization, and Human Inspired Technology Centre (HIT), University of Padua, Padua, Italy. veronica.pucci@phd.unipd.it.
Giulio ContemoriDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. giulio.contemori@unipd.it.
Maria Silvia SaccaniPadua Neuroscience Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giorgio ArcaraDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sara MondiniDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, Department of Developmental and Social Psychology and Socialization, and Human Inspired Technology Centre (HIT), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Mario BonatoDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. mario.bonato@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent methodological developments have contributed to a significant advance in computerised neuropsychological instruments and procedures, including those accessible from remote. In this paper we present Auto-GEMS, a newly developed, web-based, self-administered screening test allowing to quickly estimate an individual's cognitive state also considering their cognitive reserve. Auto-GEMS measures cognitive functioning on eleven items similarly to the in-person paper-and-pencil version (GEMS) and to the remote (phone or video call) version (Tele-GEMS) of the same screening. We collected normative data on a sample of 1308 Italian-speaking participants (age range 18-93) to verify its psychometric properties and computed regression models on demographic variables to establish clinical cut-offs. The psychometric properties of Auto-GEMS have shown good internal consistency, test-retest reliability and convergent validity. This short and user-friendly tool has a number of potential applications. For instance, it can be useful in clinical practice to monitor the cognitive profile of patients or vulnerable individuals, or even administered in a face-to-face, standard clinical setting. It can also be used in research studies to screen participants. The testing materials and the collected data are freely available in a digital archive along with a web App to visualise the test outcome with reference to its normative data.

Indexed as

CognitionInternetAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultComputerized screeningDigital healthSelf-administrationTele-neuropsychologyWeb-based cognitive screening

Identifiers

PMID39527293
PMCPMC11554820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.