Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39529482›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of anaesthesiology2025

Co-administration of dexmedetomidine with total intravenous anaesthesia in carotid endarterectomy reduces requirements for propofol and improves haemodynamic stability: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.

Christian Vetter, Eva R Meyer, Kathleen Seidel, David Bervini, Markus Huber, Vladimir Krejci

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of anaesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04662177 (Co-administration of Dexmedetomidine in Carotid Endarterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04662177 phase4completednot on this map

Co-administration of Dexmedetomidine in Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) With Intraoperative SSEP and MEP Monitoring: A Single-centre Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2018 to 2020Enrolled23ConditionsCarotid StenosisArmsDexmedetomidine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian VetterFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (CV, ERM, MH, VK), and Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (KS, DB).
Eva R Meyer
Kathleen Seidel
David Bervini
Markus Huber
Vladimir Krejci

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal intravenous anaesthesia guided by electroencephalography and neurophysiological monitoring may be used for carotid endarterectomy. Reduction of brain metabolic demand during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery with propofol titrated to burst suppression requires effect-site concentrations that may delay emergence and interfere with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that dexmedetomidine decreases the effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst-suppression in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

designRandomised controlled trial.

participantsPatients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

settingUniversity Hospital of Berne, Switzerland, from October 2018 to September 2024.

interventionsPatients were randomised into a control ( n  = 23) and a dexmedetomidine groups ( n  = 22). Total intravenous anaesthesia was administered to both groups. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg kg -1 over 10 min) before induction, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion (0.4 μg kg -1  h -1 ). The effect-site concentrations of propofol were titrated against frontal electroencephalography parameters. Burst suppression was induced with propofol during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst-suppression. The secondary outcomes were the requirement for vasoactive substances, neurophysiological monitoring parameters, and postoperative delirium.

resultsThe effect-site concentration of propofol required for burst suppression was 4.0 μg ml -1 [3.50 to 4.90] (median [interquartile range]) in the dexmedetomidine group compared with 6.0 μg ml -1 [5.5 to 7.3] in the control group ( P  < 0.001). Less norepinephrine was required in the dexmedetomidine group (total 454 μg [246 to 818] compared with 1000 μg [444 to 1326] ( P  = 0.015) in the control group). Dexmedetomidine did not affect intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

conclusionCo-administration of dexmedetomidine to total intravenous anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy decreased the effect-site concentrations of propofol required for burst suppression by 33%. The propofol-sparing effect and peripheral alpha-agonism of dexmedetomidine may explain the reduced requirement for vasopressors.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04662177.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, IntravenousAnesthetics, IntravenousDexmedetomidineEndarterectomy, CarotidHemodynamicsPropofolAgedElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfusions, IntravenousIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnesthetics, IntravenousDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesPropofol

Identifiers

PMID39529482
PMCPMC11784905

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.