Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39530014›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

Streamlining management in thoracic trauma: radiomics- and AI-based assessment of patient risks.

Ashraf F Hefny, Taleb M Almansoori, Darya Smetanina, Daria Morozova, Roman Voitetskii, Karuna M Das, Aidar Kashapov, Nirmin A Mansour, Mai A Fathi, Mohammed Khogali and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashraf F HefnyDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Taleb M AlmansooriDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Darya SmetaninaDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Daria MorozovaDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Roman VoitetskiiDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Karuna M DasDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Aidar KashapovDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Nirmin A MansourDepartment of Family Medicine, Ambulatory Health Services, SEHA, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Mai A FathiDepartment of Surgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammed KhogaliInstitute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Milos LjubisavljevicDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Yauhen StatsenkoDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In blunt chest trauma, patient management is challenging because clinical guidelines miss tools for risk assessment. No clinical scale reliably measures the severity of cases and the chance of complications. Aim: The objective of the study was to optimize the management of patients with blunt chest trauma by creating models prognosticating the transfer to the intensive care unit and in-hospital length of stay (LOS). Methods: The study cohort consisted of 212 cases. We retrieved information on the cases from the hospital's trauma registry. After segmenting the lungs with Lung CT Analyzer, we performed volumetric feature extraction with data-characterization algorithms in PyRadiomics. Results: To predict whether the patient will require intensive care, we used the three groups of findings: ambulance, admission, and radiomics data. When trained on the ambulance data, the models exhibited a borderline performance. The metrics improved after we retrained the models on a combination of ambulance, laboratory, radiologic, and physical examination data (81.5% vs. 94.4% Sn). Radiomics data were the top-accurate predictors (96.3% Sn). Age, vital signs, anthropometrics, and first aid time were the best-performing features collected by the ambulance service. Laboratory findings, AIS scores for the lower extremity, abdomen, head, and thorax constituted the top-rank predictors received on admission to the hospital. The original first-order kurtosis had the highest predictive value among radiomics data. Top-informative radiomics features were derived from the right hemithorax because the right lung is larger. We constructed regression models that can adequately reflect the in-hospital LOS. When trained on different groups of data, the machine-learning regression models showed similar performance (MAE/ROV Conclusion: The study findings can be used to optimize the management of patients with a chest blunt injury as a specific case of monotrauma. The models we built may help physicians to stratify patients by risk of worsening and overcome the limitations of existing tools for risk assessment. High-quality AI models trained on radiomics data demonstrate superior performance.

Indexed as

abbreviated injury scale (AIS)blunt chest traumachest CT scansinjury severity score (ISS)patient managementradiomicsregression modelsrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39530014
PMCPMC11551616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.