ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2025
Novel nerve regeneration assessment method using adult zebrafish with crush spinal cord injury.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Purinergic Receptor P2Y2 Regulates Neurogenesis and Functional Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury in Zebrafish.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Polyphenol-Rich Lemon Peel Extract Use in a Zebrafish Model of Spinal Cord Injury: Morphology, Repair-Associated Markers, and Inflammatory Profile.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Zebrafish as an Integrative Model for Central Nervous System Research: Current Advances and Translational Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of natural products bioactivity in cardiovascular diseases utilizing zebrafish models: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zebrafish (Danio rerio), an alternative to rodents, are widely used in neurological, genetic, and toxicology research. The zebrafish larval spinal cord injury model has been used in neural mechanistic analyses owing to its high regenerative capacity and throughput; however, it also had several limitations in imitating rodents. Therefore, we investigated the use of adult zebrafish as an alternative model to rodents for evaluating nerve regeneration. Here, we established a novel spinal cord regeneration evaluation method, which was based on the maximum swimming speed of adult zebrafish in a custom-built hydrodynamic-based aquarium. The spinal cords of adult male zebrafish were crushed using forceps, and maximum swimming speed and histological spinal cord regeneration were evaluated. Spinal cord-injured zebrafish showed a significant decline in motor function, followed by recovery at 3 weeks postoperatively, accompanied by histological regeneration. Spinal cord regeneration can be indirectly assessed by monitoring maximum swimming speed. They were also fed a diet containing fig extract, which can promote peripheral nerve regeneration; they were fed daily starting 1 week before the operation. Maximum swimming speed was measured time-dependently until 3 weeks postoperatively. Fig-consuming fish showed improved recovery of maximum swimming speed compared to the controls, which was consistent with the histological analysis. In summary, we established a spinal cord regeneration assessment system using adult zebrafish in a customized aquarium, which enables researchers to evaluate spinal cord regeneration in adult zebrafish similar to that of rodent experiments, contributing to faster and easier screening of neuroregenerative technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.