ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2025
A diverse hidradenitis suppurativa cohort: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 13,130 patients from a large US health care system database from 1995 to 2022.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Expert Consensus on Knowledge Gaps in Care for Dermatologic Disorders in Skin of Color.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics of hidradenitis suppurativa in a Chinese cohort: a retrospective analysis of 197 cases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost epidemiological studies of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have described homogeneous patient populations.
objectiveTo characterize demographics, modifiable health behaviors, and comorbidities of HS patients within a diverse cohort.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study of 13,130 HS patients within a health care system was conducted.
resultsA female sex bias of ∼3:1 in all racial/ethnic subgroups was observed. Black/African American (AA) patients had a lower age at HS diagnosis than White patients (37.1 years vs 39.4 years, P < .001). A higher proportion of Black/AA females than White females with HS had body mass index in the obese range (69.9% vs 56.5%; P = .03). In contrast, fewer Black/AA males with HS had a body mass index in the obese range compared to White males (51.4% vs 61.0%; P < .001). More Black/AA patients than White patients with HS had congestive heart failure (odds ratio (OR) = 2.10, confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-3.78; P < .05), chronic pulmonary disease (OR = 1.34; CI = 1.02-1.78; P < .05), diabetes with chronic complication (OR = 1.73; CI = 1.16-2.60; P < .05), renal disease (OR = 2.66; CI = 1.67-4.34; P < .05), and Charlson comorbidity index score ≥4 (OR = 1.67; CI = 1.09-2.58; P < .05). Furthermore, male patients were more likely than female patients to have renal disease (OR = 2.62; CI = 1.66-4.14; P < .05). LIMITATIONS: A single-center study.
conclusionSubgroups of HS patients had significant differences in demographics, risk factors, and comorbid conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.