SynthesisPediatric blood & cancer2025
Impact of Non-Pharmacological Cognitive Interventions on Real-World Daily Function in Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transfer Effects of Integrated Adaptive Working Memory Training in School-Age Children: Improvements in Inhibitory Control and Asymmetric Gains in Mathematical Abilities.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Visual-Motor Functions and Associated Cognitive Outcomes in Pediatric Cancer Survivors.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) frequently experience cognitive challenges, which impact their ability to participate in functional activities. This systematic review examines the effects of nonpharmacological cognitive interventions on functional outcomes (e.g., activities of daily living). We systematically searched eight databases (e.g., PubMed, EMBASE) from 2012 to 2023. Two team members independently screened articles and extracted article, intervention, sample characteristics, and outcome data. We assessed intervention reporting with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, representing 12 unique trials. Four of the six trials evaluating Cogmed, a computerized working memory training program, demonstrated functional benefits; small to large effects were observed for academic achievement (Cohen's d = 0.28-0.87) and decreased inattention in daily life (d = -0.36 and -0.98). Other interventions included exergaming, math or reading interventions, occupational therapy, and neurofeedback. Less than half of studies reported on intervention personalization (n = 5), fidelity assessment (n = 4), or cost (n = 1). Study heterogeneity limited our ability to meta-analyze results for functional outcomes. Limited evidence and gaps in quality of intervention reporting are barriers to addressing the cognitive challenges of CCS. Standardizing functional outcome measurement, identifying effective interventions, and improving the quality of intervention reporting could accelerate the translation of intervention research to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.