ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2024
Understanding the relationship between breast cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and gut microbiota: a narrative review.
Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity in triple-negative breast cancer: a mini-review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Interaction between the breast tumor microenvironment and gut microbiome.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Reprogramming the breast tumor immune microenvironment: cold-to-hot transition for enhanced immunotherapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Review
- Causal relationship between gut microbiota and malignant lymphoma: a two-way two-sample mendelian randomization study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Effects of gut microbiota in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The composition of gut microbiota plays an important role in predicting and influencing outcomes of cancer treated with immunotherapy. Our objective is to summarize the role of gut microbiota and immunotherapy in breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search from inception until July 2024 of key search terms including immunity, breast neoplasm, gastrointestinal microbiome/microbiota, fecal microbiota transplantation, pro- and prebiotics, antibiotics and immunotherapy using EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL was conducted. The results were screened by two reviewers independently and synthesized and presented descriptively. Key Content and Findings: Thirteen studies (5 clinical, 8 pre-clinical) met the eligibility criteria and were published from 2020-2024. Clinical studies showed that the composition and diversity of gut microbiota was associated with patient response to immunotherapy. In pre-clinical studies, dysbiotic states induced by obesity, antibiotics, and diet were associated with immunosuppression and influenced response to programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Microbiota-modulating treatments such as probiotics showed the ability to enhance response to immunotherapy, indicating their potential use as adjunct therapies in breast cancer treatment. Conclusions: The composition of gut microbiota could help predict the chance of response to immunotherapy, and modulating gut microbiota has the potential to enhance the efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in breast cancer. However, the available data relating to breast cancer are limited. Larger prospective studies are required to further elucidate their role as a biomarker and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.