Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39534593›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of general medicine2024

Decongestant Effect of "Coldamaris Akut", a Carrageenan- and Sorbitol-Containing Nasal Spray in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.

Nicole Unger-Manhart, Martina Morokutti-Kurz, Petra Zieglmayer, Antonella Russo, Cornelia Siegl, Marielle König-Schuster, Christiane Koller, Philipp Graf, Christine Graf, Patrick Lemell and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04532762 (Demonstration of a Decongestant Effect of "Coldamaris Akut" Compared to Saline Nasal Spray in Subjects Suffering From Grass Pollen Induced Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04532762 nacompletednot on this map

Demonstration of a Decongestant Effect of "Coldamaris Akut" Compared to Saline Nasal Spray in Subjects Suffering From Grass Pollen Induced Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarinomed Biotech AGRan2020 to 2020Enrolled42ConditionsAllergic Rhinitis, Allergic RhinoconjunctivitisArmsnasal spray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nicole Unger-Manhart *Marinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Martina Morokutti-Kurz *Marinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Petra ZieglmayerVienna Challenge Chamber, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-9459
Antonella RussoMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Cornelia SieglMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Marielle König-SchusterMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Christiane KollerMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Philipp GrafMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Christine GrafMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Patrick LemellVienna Challenge Chamber, Vienna, Austria.
Markus SavliBiostatistik & Consulting GmbH, Zuerich, Switzerland.
René ZieglmayerVienna Challenge Chamber, Vienna, Austria.
Hanna DellagoMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Eva Prieschl-GrassauerMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0118-4297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a hyperosmolar, barrier-forming nasal spray based on carrageenan and sorbitol, and to demonstrate its decongestant effect in the context of allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: The efficacy of the nasal spray components was tested in vitro by barrier function, virus replication inhibition, and water absorption assays. The decongestant effectiveness was assessed in a randomized, controlled, crossover environmental chamber trial, where participants with a history of seasonal grass pollen AR were exposed to grass pollen allergens under controlled conditions. Forty-one adults were randomized to receive either carrageenan- and sorbitol-containing nasal spray (CS) or saline solution (SS). After 1 week, participants repeated the exposure with the treatment they had not received before. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in nasal congestion symptom score (NCSS). Secondary efficacy endpoints were nasal airflow, nasal secretion, total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total ocular symptom score (TOSS) and total respiratory symptom score (TRSS). Results: Preclinical assays demonstrated barrier-building, virus-blocking, and water-withdrawing properties of the CS components. In the clinical study, there was no significant difference in mean NCSS change from pre- to post-treatment between CS and SS. However, nasal airflow increased over time after treatment with CS, while it declined after SS, leading to a growing difference in airflow between CS and SS (p = 0.04 at 6:00 h). Mean nasal secretion over 2-6 h was reduced by ~25% after CS (p = 0.003) compared to pre-treatment, while it was reduced by only ~16% after SS (p = 0.137). No significant differences in TNSS, TOSS and TRSS were observed between CS and SS. Conclusion: CS improves nasal airflow and reduces nasal secretion in adults with AR. We propose CS as a safe and effective adjuvant to baseline pharmacological treatments. Trial Registration: NCT04532762.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitisbarriercarrageenanCarragelosedrug-freenonpharmacological

Identifiers

PMID39534593
PMCPMC11556324

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.