Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535613›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

Boolean network modeling and its integration with experimental read-outs : An interdisciplinary presentation using a leukemia model.

Julia Maier, Julian D Schwab, Silke D Werle, Ralf Marienfeld, Peter Möller, Nadine T Gaisa, Nensi Ikonomi, Hans A Kestler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Unveiling toxicological adverse outcomes: toward construction and simulation of large-scale networks.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia MaierInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Julian D SchwabInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Silke D WerleInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Ralf MarienfeldInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Peter MöllerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Nadine T GaisaInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Nensi IkonomiInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Hans A KestlerInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. hans.kestler@uni-ulm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited availability of suitable animal models and cell lines often impedes experimental cancer research. Wet-laboratory experiments are also time-consuming and cost-intensive. In this review, we present an in silico modeling strategy, namely, Boolean network (BN) models, and demonstrate how it could be applied to streamline experimental design and to focus the effort of experimental read-outs. Boolean network models allow for the dynamic analysis of large molecular signaling pathways and their crosstalks. After establishing and validating a specific tumor model, mechanistic insights into the tumor cell behavior can be gained by studying the trajectories of different tumor phenotypes. Also, tumor driver and drug target screenings can be performed. These automatic screenings can help to identify new intervention targets and putative biomarkers for tumor evolution, hence guiding new wet-laboratory experiments. The goal of this round-up is to demonstrate how to establish, validate, and use BN modeling and its crosstalks in classic wet-laboratory research using a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) BN model.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansLeukemiaLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellSignal TransductionDrug target screeningDynamic modelingLarge regulatory networksSystems biologyTumor driver screening

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.