Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39536062›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Cross sectional survey of maternal and newborn quality of care in Niger: Selected findings, lessons learned and recommendations.

Alexandre Quach, Barbara Madaj, Katie Fahy, Aminata Tinni Konate, Ibrahim Souley, Lucien Omar Marcel, Adama Traore, Monir Islam, Uzochukwu Egere, Charles Anawo Ameh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexandre QuachDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9990-7571
Barbara MadajDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4073-3191
Katie FahyDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-237X
Aminata Tinni KonateMinistère de la Santé Publique, de la Population et des Affaires Sociales, Niamey, Niger.
Ibrahim SouleyMinistère de la Santé Publique, de la Population et des Affaires Sociales, Niamey, Niger.
Lucien Omar MarcelMinistère de la Santé Publique, de la Population et des Affaires Sociales, Niamey, Niger.
Adama TraoreDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Monir IslamDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Uzochukwu EgereDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Charles Anawo AmehDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive assessments of quality of care (QoC) are essential for monitoring progress towards meeting global and national maternal and newborn health (MNH) targets. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) and the Niger Ministry of Public Health adapted a 2014 WHO QoC tool to cover antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) and include client voices through exit interviews. The objectives of the study were to assess quality of MNH care in Niger and to document lessons learnt from implementing the LSTM QoC tool. Quality of Care (QoC) was assessed using five tools: health facility survey (using register and official record data), partograph reviews, healthcare provider knowledge assessment, exit interviews with clients, and observation of antenatal and postnatal care. A nationally representative sample of 110 public healthcare facilities at three levels (integrated health centres, district hospitals and mother-child hospitals) and 2153 women were included. Descriptive analysis with 95% confidence intervals was presented. The health facility survey showed variable access to electricity (63% [53-72]), water (72% [62-81]), and transportation (40% [31-50]). Tests and treatment for HIV, TB, and malaria were found in more than 90% of relevant facilities. During observation of first ANC visit, 62% [48-74] women were tested for HIV; 13% [5-30] for pre-eclampsia and 22% [12-36] for anaemia. Observation of PNC showed much lower rates of screening (15% [7-27] tested for HIV and 4% [0;11] for malaria). Partographs were used in 86% of deliveries with inconsistent completion. At client interviews, respectful care indicators were variable, with providers not always explaining results to clients (59% [50-67]). Targeted allocation of resources and training could impact on QoC and reduce missed opportunities for prevention, screening and management of diseases among pregnant women and babies. The QoC assessment tool proved capable of offering a comprehensive overview of priorities in MNH, while maintaining feasibility in the Nigerien context.

Identifiers

PMID39536062
PMCPMC11559989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.