ArticleScientific reports2024
Anesthetic effects on electrophysiological responses across the visual pathway.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Voltage-gated sodium channels in the nervous system: Molecular physiology to therapeutic interventions.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Advances in RPGR gene therapy for X‑linked retinitis pigmentosa: From preclinical insights to clinical application (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The Role of Non-coding RNAs in Diabetic Retinopathy: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Potential.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anesthetics are widely used in electrophysiological tests to assess retinal and visual system functions to avoid experimental errors caused by movement and stress in experimental animals. To determine the most suitable anesthetic for visual electrophysiological tests, excluding ketamine and chloral hydrate due to regulatory and side effect concerns, this study investigated the effects of ethyl carbamate (EC), avertin (AR), and pentobarbital sodium (PS) on visual signal conduction in the retina and primary visual cortex. Assessments included flash electroretinogram (FERG), pattern electroretinogram (PERG), pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP), and flash visual evoked potentials (FVEP), FERG and FVEP were used to evaluate the responses of the retina and visual cortex to flash stimuli, respectively, while PERG and PVEP assessed responses to pattern stimuli. The research showed that AR demonstrates the least disruption to the visual signal pathway, as evidenced by consistently high characteristic peaks in the AR group across various tests. In contrast, mice given EC exhibited the lowest peak values in both FERG and FVEP, while subjects anesthetized with PS showed suppressed oscillatory potentials and PERG responses. Notably, substantial PVEP characteristic peaks were observed only in mice anesthetized with AR. Consequently, among the three anesthetics tested, AR is the most suitable for visual electrophysiological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.