Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537872›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Anesthetic effects on electrophysiological responses across the visual pathway.

Shiyao Zhang, Weihui Xu, Shanshan Liu, Fang Xu, Xiaopeng Chen, Huan Qin, Kai Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shiyao Zhang *Institute of Visual Neuroscience and Stem Cell Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Weihui Xu *Institute of Visual Neuroscience and Stem Cell Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Shanshan LiuInstitute of Visual Neuroscience and Stem Cell Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Fang XuInstitute of Visual Neuroscience and Stem Cell Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Xiaopeng ChenInstitute of Visual Neuroscience and Stem Cell Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Huan QinInstitute of Visual Neuroscience and Stem Cell Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China. qhainne2021@outlook.com.
Kai YaoInstitute of Visual Neuroscience and Stem Cell Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430065, China. kyao21@outlook.com.

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial People's Government 2018CFB434Department of Science and Technology, Hubei Provincial People's Government 2020CFA069National Natural Science Foundation of China 31970930National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471107Wuhan University of Science and Technology 1180002Wuhan University of Science and Technology 1180030Wuhan University of Science and Technology 2023H20134Wuhan University of Science and Technology 2024H10082Wuhan University of Science and Technology 2024H20168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthetics are widely used in electrophysiological tests to assess retinal and visual system functions to avoid experimental errors caused by movement and stress in experimental animals. To determine the most suitable anesthetic for visual electrophysiological tests, excluding ketamine and chloral hydrate due to regulatory and side effect concerns, this study investigated the effects of ethyl carbamate (EC), avertin (AR), and pentobarbital sodium (PS) on visual signal conduction in the retina and primary visual cortex. Assessments included flash electroretinogram (FERG), pattern electroretinogram (PERG), pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP), and flash visual evoked potentials (FVEP), FERG and FVEP were used to evaluate the responses of the retina and visual cortex to flash stimuli, respectively, while PERG and PVEP assessed responses to pattern stimuli. The research showed that AR demonstrates the least disruption to the visual signal pathway, as evidenced by consistently high characteristic peaks in the AR group across various tests. In contrast, mice given EC exhibited the lowest peak values in both FERG and FVEP, while subjects anesthetized with PS showed suppressed oscillatory potentials and PERG responses. Notably, substantial PVEP characteristic peaks were observed only in mice anesthetized with AR. Consequently, among the three anesthetics tested, AR is the most suitable for visual electrophysiological studies.

Indexed as

AnestheticsElectroretinographyEvoked Potentials, VisualPentobarbitalRetinaVisual PathwaysAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaEthanolMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhotic StimulationUrethaneVisual CortexAnestheticsEthanolPentobarbitaltribromoethanolUrethane

Identifiers

PMID39537872
PMCPMC11561267

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.