ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Predictive modeling of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants: the impact of new diagnostic standards.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Elevated HMGB1 Levels in Neonates With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the evolving landscape: a bibliometric analysis of macrophages research in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (1990-2025)-a Web of Science Core Collection-based study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Validation of a new Japanese classification for predicting severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- Screening for biomarkers of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a bioinformatics analysis.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To provide a risk prediction for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in premature infants under the new diagnostic criteria and establish a prediction model. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively collected case data on preterm infants admitted to the NICU from August 2015 to August 2018. A lasso analysis was performed to identify the risk factors associated with the development of BPD. A nomogram predictive model was constructed in accordance with the new diagnostic criteria for BPD. Result: A total of 276 preterm infants were included in the study.The incidence of BPD under the 2018 diagnostic criteria was 11.2%. Mortality was significantly higher in the BPD group than the non-BPD group under the 2018 diagnostic criteria ( Conclusion: This study made a preliminary exploration of the risk model for early prediction of BPD and indicated good discrimination and calibration in premature infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.