ReviewAnnals of joint2024
Angiotensin II receptor blockers and their applications in orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal medicine.
Review in Annals of joint, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recognition and Lysis of Capsulolabral Adhesions Following Hip Arthroscopy and Their Role in Labral Pathology.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Postoperative angiotensin II receptor blocker use is associated with reduced 2-year reoperation rates in male patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.JSES international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly prescribed for hypertension and heart failure, and have well-described antifibrotic properties throughout medical literature. The etiology and pathogenesis of fibrosis is biologically complex with a multitude of factors playing a role in the process. Consequently, pathologic fibrosis may be significant within orthopaedics contributing to post-operative stiffness and, ultimately, negative patient outcomes. The pharmacology of ARBs has been described to combat fibrosis in preclinical settings, while the literature of ARBs antifibrotic properties in relation to orthopaedics remains scarce. However, fibrosis is one of the primary factors contributing to tissue healing and functional recovery in the field of orthopaedic surgery. Fibrosis has specifically been described in relation to shoulder surgery, knee arthroplasty and hip arthroscopy. As such, outcomes of various orthopaedic surgeries are dependent upon a balance between tissue healing and stiffness, both of which may be mediated by a fibrotic response. Importantly, ARBs have recently emerged as a potential therapy to combat fibrosis-mediated stiffness in orthopaedic surgery patients. Thus, the following review article seeks to highlight the basic and clinical science of ARBs with emphasis on their implications and indications for orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.