Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39541330›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Univariate and multivariate genomic prediction for agronomic traits in durum wheat under two field conditions.

Paolo Vitale, Giovanni Laidò, Gabriella Dono, Ivano Pecorella, Vishnu Ramasubramanian, Aaron Lorenz, Pasquale De Vita, Nicola Pecchioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paolo VitaleResearch Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), CREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-5828
Giovanni LaidòResearch Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), CREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Foggia, Italy.
Gabriella DonoResearch Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), CREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Foggia, Italy.
Ivano PecorellaResearch Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), CREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Foggia, Italy.
Vishnu RamasubramanianDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States of America.
Aaron LorenzDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States of America.
Pasquale De VitaResearch Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), CREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Foggia, Italy.
Nicola PecchioniResearch Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), CREA-Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction (GP) has been evaluated in durum wheat breeding programs for several years, but prediction accuracy (PA) remains insufficient for some traits. Recently, multivariate (MV) analysis has gained much attention due to its potential to significantly improve PA. In this study, PA was evaluated for several agronomic traits using a univariate (UV) model in durum wheat, subsequently, different multivariate genomic prediction models were performed to attempt to increase PA. The panel was phenotyped for 10 agronomic traits over two consecutive crop seasons and under two different field conditions: high nitrogen and well-watered (HNW), and low nitrogen and rainfed (LNR). Multivariate GP was implemented using two cross-validation (CV) schemes: MV-CV1, testing the model for each target trait using only the markers, and MV-CV2, testing the model for each target trait using additional phenotypic information. These two MV-CVs were applied in two different analyses: modelling the same trait under both HNW and LNR conditions, and modelling grain yield together with the five most genetically correlated traits. PA for all traits in HNW was higher than LNR for the same trait, except for the trait yellow index. Among all traits, PA ranged from 0.34 (NDVI in LNR) to 0.74 (test weight in HNW). In modelling the same traits in both HNW and LNR, MV-CV1 produced improvements in PA up to 12.45% (NDVI in LNR) compared to the univariate model. By contrast, MV-CV2 increased PA up to 56.72% (thousand kernel weight in LNR). The MV-CV1 scheme did not improve PA for grain yield when it was modelled with the five most genetically correlated traits, whereas MV-CV2 significantly improved PA by up to ~18%. This study demonstrated that increases in prediction accuracy for agronomic traits can be achieved by modelling the same traits in two different field conditions using MV-CV2. In addition, the effectiveness of MV-CV2 was established when grain yield was modelled with additional correlated traits.

Indexed as

PhenotypeTriticumGenome, PlantGenomicsModels, GeneticMultivariate AnalysisPlant BreedingQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID39541330
PMCPMC11563401

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.