ArticlePloS one2024
Univariate and multivariate genomic prediction for agronomic traits in durum wheat under two field conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of drought-tolerant ideotype in wheat using multi-trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) and comprehensive evaluation value.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-trait and multi-environment genomic prediction enhances yield components improvement in durum wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Elucidating Genotypic Variation in Quinoa via Multidimensional Agronomic, Physiological, and Biochemical Assessments.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unraveling the genetic basis of general combining ability in CIMMYT elite bread wheat germplasm: implications for breeding strategies optimization.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic prediction (GP) has been evaluated in durum wheat breeding programs for several years, but prediction accuracy (PA) remains insufficient for some traits. Recently, multivariate (MV) analysis has gained much attention due to its potential to significantly improve PA. In this study, PA was evaluated for several agronomic traits using a univariate (UV) model in durum wheat, subsequently, different multivariate genomic prediction models were performed to attempt to increase PA. The panel was phenotyped for 10 agronomic traits over two consecutive crop seasons and under two different field conditions: high nitrogen and well-watered (HNW), and low nitrogen and rainfed (LNR). Multivariate GP was implemented using two cross-validation (CV) schemes: MV-CV1, testing the model for each target trait using only the markers, and MV-CV2, testing the model for each target trait using additional phenotypic information. These two MV-CVs were applied in two different analyses: modelling the same trait under both HNW and LNR conditions, and modelling grain yield together with the five most genetically correlated traits. PA for all traits in HNW was higher than LNR for the same trait, except for the trait yellow index. Among all traits, PA ranged from 0.34 (NDVI in LNR) to 0.74 (test weight in HNW). In modelling the same traits in both HNW and LNR, MV-CV1 produced improvements in PA up to 12.45% (NDVI in LNR) compared to the univariate model. By contrast, MV-CV2 increased PA up to 56.72% (thousand kernel weight in LNR). The MV-CV1 scheme did not improve PA for grain yield when it was modelled with the five most genetically correlated traits, whereas MV-CV2 significantly improved PA by up to ~18%. This study demonstrated that increases in prediction accuracy for agronomic traits can be achieved by modelling the same traits in two different field conditions using MV-CV2. In addition, the effectiveness of MV-CV2 was established when grain yield was modelled with additional correlated traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.