ArticleBMJ open2024
Completion and reporting of COVID-19 clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first 6 months of the pandemic: cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly in the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous clinical trials were initiated. Although concerns were raised regarding the quality of the trials, the eventual research output yielded from the trials remains unknown. The objective of this study was to include all clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first 6 months of the pandemic and assess if and where their results had been reported, their completion and discontinuation rates, achieved enrolment and changes made to the primary outcome after trial registration.
methodsWe included all interventional studies related to COVID-19 first registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 1 January 2020 and 1 July 2020. We systematically searched for trial results, reported through 15 May 2023, in scientific publications, preprints and ClinicalTrials.gov. We assessed the achieved trial enrolment, trial discontinuation (reaching <90% of target enrolment), and whether the primary outcome had been changed as compared with the initial protocol registration.
resultsThe 775 clinical trials included in the analysis planned to enrol 238 933 (median (IQR) 120 (60, 304) patients; 355 (46%) of the trials had reported results, and 283 (36%) were published in a scientific journal. In the reported trials, the total enrolment was 95 332 (median (IQR) 105 (45, 222) patients. 186 (24%) trials were completed, and 169 (22%) trials were discontinued, with slow recruitment being the most stated reason for discontinuation (9% of all trials, although 30% of the discontinued trials did not report a reason). 117 (33%) of the reported trials had changed their primary outcome. In total, 157 (20%) trials were completed and published in a scientific journal, of which 105 enrolled ≥100 patients and 103 had not changed the primary outcome. 63 completed and published trials enrolled ≥100 patients and had not changed the primary outcome.
conclusionsMost clinical trials of COVID-19 registered at ClinicalTrials.gov during the first 6 months of the pandemic remained unreported or had been discontinued. Many of the trials whose results had been reported enrolled few patients and changed the primary outcome after trial registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.